Re: real analysis - it is neither continuum nor discrete
- From: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:45:13 -0700
In article
<b0fbdb29-8c4e-4218-9629-84d463de38fa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
vr <simple.popeye@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:15 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22, 12:51 pm, vr <simple.pop...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just my fuzzy thoughts -
The real analysis seems miserably stuck somewhere between discrete and
the natural continuum analysis.
You are still projecting. When your thinking is fuzzy,
you think it is the subject that it fuzzy.
The subject and the reasoning are crystal clear. Your
thinking is muddled.
It can't calm to be continuum analysis because it fails the preserve
the pattern of intervals and their bounds at the fundamental level and
collapses both to same kind of points without proper justification.
I can't get any meaning out of that sentence at all.
The set of reals is the continuum.
It also can't be discrete analysis because it desperately
I admit I get most irritated when you through these
emotionally-loaded words like "desperately" in
there. It's meaningless in this context. The
real numbers don't experience emotion.
Ok, then just ignore all such emotional stuff. I used it to emphasize
what I was saying.
I can understand your frown at these unclear thoughts. I'm not done
with assembling the my thoughts yet. They may or may not assemble into
a consistent and complete picture. I'm just trying. Thanks.
Very trying.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: ED hardy hoodies?????????????hot sell and really cheap on www.21cn-shoes.com
- Next by Date: Re: they mention various metaphors and ramble about various concerns (Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair)
- Previous by thread: Re: real analysis - it is neither continuum nor discrete
- Next by thread: Re: real analysis - it is neither continuum nor discrete
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
