Re: they mention various metaphors and ramble about various concerns (Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair)

In article
<54e6951a-43a6-42f1-ace8-9bdf90365f9d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
egroups.com>,
galathaea <galathaea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

kuratowski pairs

a, {a, b}

That is not a Kuratowski pair. (note spelling)


7 symbols to express a fundamental notion
which can be expressed in 3

a, b
^^^^

I count 4 characters. Are we using the name
numeration system?

So now when I write "Consider two real numbers x, y > 0"
I will be speaking of an ordered pair? I do not
want to do that. I have been using this construction
all along to speak of two items, and do not want
to change.

--
Michael Press
.

Loading