Re: they mention various metaphors and ramble about various concerns (Re: Kuratowski Ordered Pair)

On Dec 22, 11:32 pm, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22, 6:52 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22, 5:52 pm, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:49 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

but let me answer some of your other pressing questions:

Thank you for answering.


I note a single sentiment shines through all of these:

because you have fallen into microscope mode
this is where someone cuts up a post
and tries to find fault with small little fragments
completely missing the point of the entire message
this is a trait of argumentative personalities

and

it turns out
you don't really even know the formal theory relating them

and

i do tend to skip responding to the things
where your lack of understanding in a topic
means i will likely not get much of value

if you want to raise the level of discussion
use terms like "semantic entailment"
and use them properly
and maybe i'll think you have something to offer me
you can waste time trying to make a point with me
but your point seems very much like someone chastising
"you know 2+2=4 doncha?"
to a point on arithmetic decidability

and

i must be good at rhetoric
if even _you_ are emulating me!

and

funny though
how you think i'm discussing piaget
when i'm discussing modern research
(kind of like your archaic understanding of syntax-semantics
accusing me of errors
that only highlight your lack of understanding)

and

i make many points in my posts
but i make them in a way that others always tend to miss
instead deciding to focus on fragments they think they can tackle
as if some kind of winning
is more important than understanding

and

i tend to blame my lacks
on the lacks of others

and

i thought i understood all the points you made
and i did not see much of substance in response
instead seeing much misunderstandings of the field
propelled only by a desire for argumentation

and

most of the discussion on pairs broke down
because my statements were poorly interpreted
mostly due to a lack of understanding of the field


The sentiment is plain: you think I really, really suck.


So why do you keep writing to me? Why do you write these
expansive tomes deconstructing my personality? You've made
it clear I have nothing to offer you; my own----

*** it. You know what? I don't care what the reason is.

Just stop writing to me, okay? Put me in your killfile or something.


Marshall
.