Re: lambertW2
- From: tommy1729 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:12:21 EST
galathaea wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:42 am, "I.N. Galidakis"
<morph...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tommy1729 wrote:z*exp(exp(z))
z= lambertW2(z)* exp( exp (lambertW2(z)) )
in other words lambertW2(z) is the inverse of
z*exp(exp(z)) is real-valued for example
No it's not.
The principal branch of the inverse of
in [0,+oo).terms of the Lambert W
W(2,x) is complex valued there.
The inverse of z*exp(exp(z)) cannot be expressed in
function.
now but i called it lambertW2.
therefore the "2".
a nice function ...
i suspect he was defining a "second" lambert-like
function
not using the common lambert w here
indeed.
lagrange inversion gives a power series
with lots of e's in the terms
though
... what are you trying to imply here ?
i know we can give powerseries for it.
just as for lambertW.
but im looking for more intresting stuff.
like a closed form for nth derivative, relations between its branches , an integral representation , transformations , symmetries etc.
if any exist of course.
but they did for lambertW , so why not for this lambertW2.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
thanks for your comment.
regards
tommy1729
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lambertW2
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: lambertW2
- References:
- Re: lambertW2
- From: galathaea
- Re: lambertW2
- Prev by Date: Re: Analysis with differentiable 2...
- Next by Date: Re: how to tackle this ?
- Previous by thread: Re: lambertW2
- Next by thread: Re: lambertW2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|