Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044 <DGoncz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Well, visions of global one-ness aside, maybe I should just rewrite
the proposition this way:
A x,y,z,k in Z,
(x,y) = (y,z) = (x,z) = 1 ==>
!E k | A (a,b,c) in S={ (x,y,z),(x,z,y), ... (z,y,x) )
o(a * i(b,c), c) = k
On the other hand, maybe nobody here cares. If that is the case, I am
off to some other place!
Doug
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Computability
- From: quasi
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- References:
- Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: Joshua Cranmer
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Computability
- Prev by Date: Re: One way to combat spam in sci.math ...
- Next by Date: Re: Recovering an inner-product
- Previous by thread: Re: Computability
- Next by thread: Re: Computability
- Index(es):