Re: the need for relevance
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:25:56 -0500
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
It's so full of contradictions that I can't even start to mention
them. But ah!! You call these contradictions: "counter intuitive
results" ..
A contradiction is a theorem of the form "A & ~A". If you can show
that ZFC proves such a theorem, then we would all agree that it is a
contradiction.
But maybe you mean something else by the term "contradiction". Well,
it's a bit bad form to redefine a term that already comes with a
conventional meaning in the relevant context, but let's ignore that
for now. Tell us: what do you mean when you use the term
"contradiction", as when you say "ZFC is so full of
contradictions..."?
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Yes, I'm one of those arrogant people who tries to be quotable.
There is actually at least one person who quotes me often."
-- James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Tonico
- Re: the need for relevance
- References:
- the need for relevance
- From: quasi
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Gonçalo Rodrigues
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- the need for relevance
- Prev by Date: we ccept paypal wholesale jordans air force one dunk all are from www.kkshoestrade.com
- Next by Date: Chloe Handbags,Prada Handbags ,Coach Handbags
- Previous by thread: Re: On one of Mr. de Bruijn's essays. Was: Re: the need for relevance
- Next by thread: Re: the need for relevance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|