Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044 <DGoncz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:49:03 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 13, 7:34 pm, The Dougster 22044 <DGo...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 10, 11:16 am, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
You claimed to have checked it up to z = 256, but apparently you
missed the following counterexample:
(x,y,z) = (74,129,143) which has signature (6,3,3).
Thanks to quasi for the smallest triple with the right prime
signature. Well done!
(74, 129, 143) Really, that is good work. To limit = 143, my program
checked 1,415 triples coprime and with the inequality, from 343,000
generated triples. Wow.
P.P.S. I think another condition is x + y == z mod p. I am working to
understand that one....
Two things here: We have x^p + y^p = z^p or z | x^p + y^p, and then we
have in my P.P.S. that x+y = z mod p. Where did I get that? Well, in
AA we learned that for prime modulus p, x^p + y^p = (x+y)^p mod p, The
Student's Equality. (Students in algebra frequenetly write this in a
non-modular form; that is a mistake.) So:
x^p + y^p = z^p
(x + y)^p == z^p mod p
(x + y)^p - z^p == 0 mod p
(x + y - z)^p == 0 mod p
x + y - z == 0 mod p or
p | x + y - z
Agreed?
Doug
x
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Computability
- From: quasi
- Re: Computability
- References:
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: quasi
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- From: quasi
- Re: Computability
- From: quasi
- Re: Computability
- From: The Dougster 22044
- Re: Computability
- Prev by Date: Re: I give up. Please help me solve this problem. Thank you - Nancy Regier
- Next by Date: Re: Computability
- Previous by thread: Re: Computability
- Next by thread: Re: Computability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|