Re: On one of Mr. de Bruijn's essays. Was: Re: the need for relevance

From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:33:52 +0100

Gonçalo Rodrigues wrote: [ .. elaborate argument snipped .. ]

Whew! You've read, you've _understood_ AND you do not agree. That's far
better than I expected.

I rest my case.

Regards,
G. Rodrigues.

Han de Bruijn

.

References:
- the need for relevance
  - From: quasi
- Re: the need for relevance
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
  - From: Gonçalo Rodrigues
- Re: the need for relevance
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
  - From: Gonçalo Rodrigues
- Re: the need for relevance
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- On one of Mr. de Bruijn's essays. Was: Re: the need for relevance
  - From: Gonçalo Rodrigues

Prev by Date: Re: Polynomial Help
Next by Date: Re: What's wrong, gentlemen? Can't refute it? ...
Previous by thread: On one of Mr. de Bruijn's essays. Was: Re: the need for relevance
Next by thread: Re: the need for relevance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread