Re: the need for relevance
- From: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:29:32 -0700
In article <293e5$478f1bdd$82a1e228$8377@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Denis Feldmann wrote:
I hope almost nobody. But what of his pupils? I *do* hope someone in
Germany(?) reads it and has the means to strongly counterattack. I dont
want him expelled from the University (well, dont I?), but the real
harm he is doing is a shame for the institution...
You're a dogmatic.
He's also right! And that is just when one should be dogmatic.
.
- References:
- the need for relevance
- From: quasi
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Gonçalo Rodrigues
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Virgil
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: the need for relevance
- From: Han de Bruijn
- the need for relevance
- Prev by Date: Homotopic equivalent
- Next by Date: Homotopic equivalent again more general
- Previous by thread: Re: the need for relevance
- Next by thread: Re: the need for relevance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|