Re: Submanifold
- From: Christopher Kolago <precarion@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:13:48 EST
The origin is an isolated point for n > 3 as well: use the AM-GM
inequality to show that all other points of X satisfy
x_1^2 + ... + x_n^2 >= n^(n/(n-2)).
In my problem we can let n > 5 > 3, so according to your reasoning of course it won't be a submanifold.
I can't prove though that the inequality you have stated above is indeed true. Obviously we have that:
x_1^2 + ... + x_n^2 >= n * (x_1 * ... * x_n)^(2/n) = n * (x_1^2 + ... + x_n^2)^(2/n).
But what I should do afterwards?.. (It's probably a silly question with an easy answer - as far as I can remember, inequatilites between four means are studied on the begining of the 1st year at the university).
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Submanifold
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Submanifold
- References:
- Re: Submanifold
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Submanifold
- Prev by Date: Re: ? def of complex number
- Next by Date: Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Previous by thread: Re: Submanifold
- Next by thread: Re: Submanifold
- Index(es):