Re: the need for relevance

Virgil wrote:

In article <35237$478f17fa$82a1e228$7867@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

But let's not introduce new confusion. Let's stick to the existing
confusion: what is a materialization?

In a nutshell: making mathematics testable with (physical) experiments
(where numerical experiments may be considered as "physical", because
they are done with a physical device: a computer). See also (yours!):

Can computers test the Riemann-Roche theorem by physical experiments?

Can't decide this at first sight.

Han de Bruijn

.