Re: Maclaurin's Series
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:56:03 GMT
In article
<a158f245-f019-4dfa-a7ac-a57b8ea0e646@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) is:
x - (x^2/2!) + (x^3/3!) - (x^4/4!) + .....
And this is convergent for -1 < x <= 1 (as can be seen by exmaining
the radius of convergence of the given series where nth term is (-1)^(n
+1) * x^n / n! (n = 1,2,3......)
Okay,
Using the above it a easy to see that for instance the Maclaurin
series for ln(1+2x) is convergent for -0.5 < x <= 0.5 because (by the
series for ln(1+x) ) it is convergent for -1 < 2x <= 1
and so on, similarly if we wanted the convergence criteria for the
Maclaurin series of ln(Sqrt(1-x-2x^2)) we could write the function as
ln(Sqrt[(1-2x)(1+x)]) = 0.5 * [ln(1-2x) + ln(1+x)] ans so we get (by
comparison with the above) -0.5 <= x < 0.5.
In a similar way how can we establish the convergence criteria for the
Maclaurin expansion of ln(1+x+x^2).
Can we not say that it is -1 < x + x^2 <= 1 ?
No. That would be the answer for an expansion in powers of (x + x^2),
but Maclaurin is an expansion in powers of x.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- References:
- Maclaurin's Series
- From: mitch
- Maclaurin's Series
- Prev by Date: Re: problem of arithmetic modulo
- Next by Date: couple of questions about group theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Maclaurin's Series
- Next by thread: problem of arithmetic modulo
- Index(es):