Re: Compact open topology
- From: sanchopancho80@xxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:50:55 -0800 (PST)
On 27 Jan., 20:46, Philippe Gaucher <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As set map, hom(X x Y, Z) ---> hom(Y, hom(X,Z)) is always bijective of
course. But take a continuous map f:XxY-->Z, the map f(-,y) is not
necessarily continuous.
Yes, that's what I wanted to say: The TOP map hom(X x Y, Z) --->
hom(Y, hom(X,Z)) does not EXIST in general in TOP, because it is not
continuous, right? But it is always bijective. So the local
compactness of X guarantees the existence in TOP, not the bijectivity.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compact open topology
- From: Philippe Gaucher
- Re: Compact open topology
- References:
- Compact open topology
- From: sanchopancho80
- Re: Compact open topology
- From: Philippe Gaucher
- Re: Compact open topology
- From: sanchopancho80
- Re: Compact open topology
- From: sanchopancho80
- Re: Compact open topology
- From: Philippe Gaucher
- Compact open topology
- Prev by Date: Re: proving limit for given values of epsilon
- Next by Date: Re: Compact open topology
- Previous by thread: Re: Compact open topology
- Next by thread: Re: Compact open topology
- Index(es):
Loading