Re: How to Replicate NoEinstein's M-M Invalidation (is Copyrighted.)

No Einstein wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:34 pm, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear Math Junkies: Recently, this same post
(copied
below) was put on
the sci.physics site. But not a single
'scientist'
visiting there has
been objective enough to write a few simple
algebraic
equations that
INVALIDATE the 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment,
AND
take down SR and
GR with it. Does 'math' carry a 'status quo
bias',
too? If any of
you are patient enough to read and understand a
math
problem, and can
solve such, you will surpass the objectivity of
most
of Google's post
hoppers. By taking things just one equation at a
time, you will begin
to see why M-M failed--as I have done. --
NoEinstein
--
__________

Are you good at algebra? Then, you might enjoy
enjoy seeing if you can
replicate NoEinstein's invalidation of the
historic
1887 Michelson-
Morley interferometer experiment. Such was
seeking
to measure Earth's
velocity and direction in the cosmos. When the
experiment was first
conducted, it was assumed that there was an
energy
form called ether--
even in the vacuum of space. If, by chance,
light
traveling in the
direction of motion of the Earth was slowed in
passing through the
ether, then, the velocity of the Earth could be
determined by how much
the light's velocity had slowed. And the
direction
of motion of the
Earth would correspond to the azimuth of the
maximum
slowing. But no
interference phase changes were seen at any
azimuth.
So, the
experiment was a failure... Many, especially A.
A.
Michelson, were
miffed to understand why the experiment didn't
work.
To have been a failure, the M-M experiment is
nt is considered by many
to be the greatest scientific experiment of all
time.
Such is because
the explanations of Lorentz and FitzGerald that
"all
matter contracts
in the direction of motion" became the basis for
Einstein's theories
of relativity.
But what if matter doesn't contract in the
n the direction of motion?
Of course those men, and Einstein, would be
wrong.
The author of this
post, NoEinstein--who has a background in
structural
design--didn't
believe that velocity could compress matter or
make
any structure or
material contract. But he had to find an
alternative
explanation for
WHY the experiment failed. His intuition told
him
that light, as with
sound, speeds up when shined in the direction of
motion of the Earth,
and slows down when shined in the direction
opposite
to the Earth's
motion. Would those two assumptions--that were
never
considered by
others--yield negative results for the M-M
experiment, and without
having to resort to... "contracting matter" due
to
velocity?
NoEinstein's simple algebraic disproofs, that he
is
hereby inviting
others to replicate, will require an above
average
ability to
visualize the M-M apparatus moving at various
angles
relative to
Earth's velocity vector.
Once emitted from the light source, those rays
rays will race around
their individual, tee shaped, courses to be
reflected
by two mirrors--
one normal, or perpendicular; the other the 45
degree
beamsplitter,
that reflects light at a 90 degree angle--till
each
light ray finally
arrives at the target. A wave (crest or valley)
reaches the target as
a SINGLE timed event from emission to target.
The
next wave (crest or
valley) completes another timed event, identical
to
the former, but
has different values depending upon the azimuth
to
which the apparatus
is oriented, relative to the Earth's velocity
vector.
Each light ray
is actually a continuous TRAIN of evenly spaced
photons of a single
frequency. The TIME required for a single photon
in
either train to
reach a mirror, or to reach the target, is the
same
as for any other
photon in that train.
So, to simplify understanding, assume that just
just TWO side-by-side
photons are simultaneously emitted from the
source,
each traveling its
own unique, tee shaped course to the target. A
schematic diagram of
the Michelson-Morley experiment can be found in
most
encyclopedias, or
on the WEB. For consistency, assume that the
light
source is in the -
Y position on the crossed light paths; the 50%
silvered, 45 degree
beamsplitter is at the origin of X-X & Y-Y, and
reflects LEFT, or
toward -X, at the first reflection; perpendicular
Mirror 1 is at +Y,
and is equidistant from the center of the
beamsplitter; perpendicular
Mirror 2 is at -X, and is equidistant from the
center
of the
beamsplitter; and finally, the target surface is
perpendicular at +X,
and is equidistant from the center of the 45
degree
beamsplitter.
The light rays (or just those two photons) get
) get to travel one of
two light courses. Course 1 is: Source, through
the
half-silvered
beamsplitter to Mirror 1; then, from Mirror 1
back to
the 45 degree
beamsplitter; then, from the 45 degree
beamsplitter
to the target
(located on the front of the telescope). Course
2
is: Source to the
45 degree beamsplitter; then, from such to Mirror
2;
then, from Mirror
2 the light reflects back through the
half-silvered
beamsplitter to
arrive at the same target on the front of the
telescope.
For the results of M-M to be negative, two
, two photons emitted at the
same instant from the source must reflect around
their own tee shaped
light courses and arrive at the target in the
exact
same amount of
TIME regardless of the orientation of the
apparatus
relative to
Earth's velocity vector. Important note: While
the
photons are in
transit, the apparatus is constantly moving. The
point of original
"aim" of the light is to cross the centerline of
the
45 degree
mirror. The purpose of algebra is to calculate
WHERE
the 45 degree
mirror will be when the photons reflect from
such.
Algebra is also
needed to calculate how far each photon must
travel
to reach a given
moving mirror and the moving target. How fast
are
those moving? Of
course it depends upon the orientation relative
to
the velocity vector
of the Earth. There are 360 degrees of possible
apparatus orientation
to consider. But first consider just the four
orthogonal
orientations. Since there are two light courses,
that means you must
do eight algebraic calculations of the TIME to
the
target; and do
eight accrued algebraic calculations of the total
distance the light
must travel. Done correctly, the TIME
calculations
will all be the
same, while the DISTANCE calculations will be
longer
or shorter than
the measured size of the apparatus.
Consider that each of the four legs of each
each course is length
unity, or 1. To simplify calculations, assume
that
the velocity of
light c, also, is unity or 1. And assume that
Earth's velocity is .01
(of c), and that the apparatus will move a
maximum of
.01 in the time
it takes a photon to travel just one leg of the
four
legs to the
target (as measured when at rest). Re read the
above
while looking at
a schematic diagram of M-M. Most Important:
Remember
that the
apparatus is MOVING while the photons are in
transit
to a particular
mirror, or to the target. Check your algebra for
each orientation
before considering the next orientation (90
degrees
clockwise or
counterclockwise as you wish). Good luck to
everyone!

Respectfully submitted, -- NoEinstein --
Other posts of mine beginning in 2007:

Where Angels Fear to Fall

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm
/
thread/8152ef3e...
Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity
/
browse_frm/thre...
Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm
/
thread/43f6f316...
An Einstein Disproof for Dummies

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thr
e
ad/thread/f7a63...
Another look at Einstein

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm
/
thread/41670721...
Three Problems for Math and Science

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thr
e
ad/thread/bb07f30aab43c49c?hl=en
Matter from Thin Air

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thr
e

ad/thread/ee4fe3946dfc0c31/1f1872476bc6ca90?hl=en#1f18
72476bc6ca90
Curing Einstein's Disease

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thr
e

ad/thread/4ff9e866e0d87562/f5f848ad8aba67da?hl=en#f5f8
48ad8aba67da
NC Buries Head in Sand to Einstein Disproofs

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thr
e

ad/thread/ca7733d51c0d6ec0/d68a772ab0b32c8f?hl=en#d68a
772ab0b32c8f
NC Governor Should Resign Over Science

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thr
e
ad/thread/2e892e00156d4d92?hl=en#

ATTENTION: Those of you who are interested in
discussing the various
moot points of Einstein's theories, or the
off-shoots
of his
"reasoning", are invited to view the various
posts of
-- NoEinstein --
shown above. I have conclusively disproved
Einstein
both
mathematically and experimentally. Those of you
wishing to reply to
any point of science, are urged to do so in the
most
recent post(s),
because the earlier ones, though still quite apt
as
to the science,
are no longer being checked for comments. I hope
that you will find
my links both interesting and educational! --
NoEinstein --

i am somewhat intrested.

wasnt einstein already somewhat disproved by QM ?

i have my doubts on M-M too , but im not sure.

i am not agianst einstein , its beautifull math at
times , but thats not sufficient for " truth ".

lets say im " neutral " ...

i am however willing to admit im no expert ,
however i partially blame society ; i dont have the
money or tools to do reseach experiments ( that
havent been done a 1000000 before. ).

i have some theorems of my own about physics , but
no experiments to justify. ( and no GUT , just
partial ideas )

regards
tommy1729

Dear Tommy: Yes, you can make a difference! Go to
your encyclopedia
and look up A. A. Michelson. Look at the schematic
of the M-M
experiment. Then, imagine that two "horses" are
racing around those
two light courses. Take one horse at a time and
write an algebraic
equation for the time to travel to a mirror when the
mirror's speed
(and the horse's) are boosted by the same amount.
That is like
running a race inside of a big moving building.
Neither the horse,
nor the mirror knows it's moving, and the time it
takes will always be
the same as if the building wasn't moving at all!

But while light is in free transit to a mirror, the
mirror CAN move--
equal to Earth's velocity component in that
direction. Algebra will
show that when the distance is increased, the light
speed is
increased, correspondingly, to always get the light
to the mirror or
target in the same amount of TIME. Greater speed of
the light, but
always the same TIME to the mirror or target! And
THAT disproves 'c'
as maximum, and disproves SR and GR! -- NoEinstein
--

yes that would disprove SR and GR.

however I KNOW enough relativity to know that einstein predicts the light in fact slow down in that sence in the direction the buildings and mirrors are moving.

this is just pythagoras ; since the distance between the mirrors is actually increased by adding a velocity to them.

so the light will hit LATER in time, but still with light speed.

this is what einstein thought experiments say.

and his math too.

and ive been told this experiment has been tested severely.

( and no relation to M-M )

regards
tommy1729
.

Relevant Pages
Loading