Re: Abolish Fractions?

quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
amzoti <amzoti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thoughts?
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/mathscience/2008-01-23-fractions_N.htm

He's a kook.
Without a solid understanding of ordinary fractions, a student
has little chance of understanding algebraic fractions.
Thus, "down with fractions" has, as a corollary, "down with algebra".

Perhaps you misunderstand his proposal. He's not proposing to
eliminate fractions. Rather I think he is proposing that one
should teach decimal fractions first and delay the introduction
of integral fractions until they are actually needed and can be
better understood. I think that such a proposal shouldn't be
dismissed without intelligent discussion (which "He's a kook"
certainly is not). See my earlier post in this thread.

--Bill Dubuque
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Abolish Fractions?
    ... He's a kook. ... Without a solid understanding of ordinary fractions, a student ... Rather I think he is proposing that one ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Abolish Fractions?
    ... If he had only been proposing not to teach all children all of the ... rules for calculating with fractions, he might have a decimal point, ... that operations with decimals would make sense. ... Am I just missing the joke? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Abolish Fractions?
    ... Without a solid understanding of ordinary fractions, a student ... has little chance of understanding algebraic fractions. ... Rather I think he is proposing that one ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Abolish Fractions???? the nutty professor 3 -> out now !!
    ... quasi wrote: ... He's a kook. ... if you cant work with fractions. ... he should have better said abolish aleph_3 instead of fractions. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Abolish Fractions???? the nutty professor 3 -> out now !!
    ... quasi wrote: ... He's a kook. ... if you cant work with fractions. ... he should have better said abolish aleph_3 instead of fractions. ...
    (sci.math)