Re: Abolish Fractions?
- From: Bill Dubuque <wgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2008 03:55:22 -0500
Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill Dubuque <wgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In fact I suspect most readers will have a hard time thinking
of any real-word problem that requires integral fractions as
opposed to decimal fractions. How about it naysayers?
At race tracks in Great Britain, the betting odds are expressed
in ratio form, with whole number oddments.
But that doesn't *require* integral fractions since the odds
could just as easily be presentated as decimal real number
approximations without any loss for this particular application.
There is nothing inherently integral in this case.
--Bill Dubuque
.
- References:
- Abolish Fractions?
- From: amzoti
- Re: Abolish Fractions?
- From: quasi
- Re: Abolish Fractions?
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Abolish Fractions?
- From: MrKofner
- Re: Abolish Fractions?
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Abolish Fractions?
- From: Virgil
- Abolish Fractions?
- Prev by Date: Re: Abolish Fractions?
- Next by Date: Re: about Lebesgue measuable set
- Previous by thread: Re: Abolish Fractions?
- Next by thread: Re: Abolish Fractions?
- Index(es):