Re: Is the term 'canceling each other's vote' a fallacy or fact?

it's not a fallacy, if you're psychic; same goes
for saying that one state decided the results,
which was just a way for the media to ignore
the irregularities that occured in states,
other than Florida, in 2000.

anyway -- and I'm not blaming *this*
on Gore per se; his lawyers? -- the "consortium"
of papers showed that he would have won,
if the mandated state-wide recount had
been allowed -- by him not asking
for a partial one.

the basic effect, especially with the ATMs,
is that the "New" Voting News Service,
with the TV networks, call the election,
before any possibility of bringing the slip
of paper back from the ATM for a recount ...
if the ATM actually printed one ... and
if there were *any* procedure
in the Help America Vote Act, to do so.

thus:
it is somewhat more recondite,
to use the diameter = one;
thus, circumference & area are just pi. then,
you still have to "explain,"
why the volume is pi/6.

anyway, the fact that
the area of the great circle is a quarter
of the sphere's, shows, it's (somehow) tetrahedral,
a la Buckafka Fullofitarians.

thus:
yeah, but how many Oscars did you get?

thus quoth:
These gravitational redshift objects
are evenly distributed throughout the universe.
Quasar's are compact objects
about one light week in diameter. The close ones'
redshifts are mostly from their gravitation.

thus:
one could profitably dwell on the abstract,
4D geometry of Coxeter et al, in that
it's very special amongst the nD ones. however,
the best approach is Bucky's:
start with the tetrahedron,
not the hexahedron.... even though
it's impossible to find a Buckyoid statement
that would really clarify this; so,
just look at the pictures in _S_!...
monsieur Nelson has some sort of results,
actually n-dimensional, but
I can't configure it without a computer, so....

How well do you know the 120-cell?

thus:
don't know about doing it for conics,
but you just construct two diameters
for a circle. you must not have
done any compass-constructions, if
that's what you're referring to....
should also be doable in origami,
given three points of a circle or,
more conducively to paper,
three tangents.

what's the big deal?...
the British physicist, Jeans,
lead an expedition to observe an eclipse,
to look at the position of Mercury,
specifically to verify E's prediction;
was it already known?...
an aether theory may be better than GR, but
I don't think you have it. as for SR,
the only problem is spacetime, but
was it really the fault of Lorentz et al,
not Minkowski?

M&M's anomaly was a yearly one, but it was very,
very small; of course, it was guaged
with the interference of the two beams,
split from the lasersource ... I mean,
coherent/pinhole sunlight,
a la Young, Fresnel et al.

--*** Cheeny, National Treasure:
Run, Trickier *** -- Run for Indy superVeep!...
Al Gore, Best Actor, Occidental Dino Awards!
.