Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:57:59 +0100
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
S[x] = { S(z) | z in x }
= { y | (E z in x)(E n in N)(A m in N)(m > n -> y in S_m(z)) }
I do not see why that should be the same set as
T(x) = { y | (E n in N)(A m in N)(m > n -> (E z in x)(y in S_m(z))) }
So, you have to show that
(E z in x)(E n in N)(A m in N)(m > n -> y in S_m(z))
iff
(E n in N)(A m in N)(m > n -> (E z in x)(y in S_m(z)))
I don't believe it's so.
In the lucid notation by G. Frege:
lim S_n[N] = {N} . Hence S[N] = {N} . But also:
n -> oo
lim S_n[N] = lim N \ {0,1,2,3 .. ,n} = N \ lim {0,1,2,3 .. ,n} = N \ N
n -> oo n -> oo n -> oo
Hence: S[N] = {} . No ?
Is there a problem while interchanging a set difference with our limit ?
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- References:
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Virgil
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Prev by Date: Re: How to learn real analysis-
- Next by Date: New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Feb 11, 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Next by thread: Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|