Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:11:38 +0100
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:57:59 +0100, Han de Bruijn
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, actually, I used a slightly other notation.
In the lucid notation by G. Frege:
For example *I* would write
lim S_n(0) = N.
n
But notation is not enough. The notation only expresses a certain
notion, in this case the notion of /limit/ for sequences of sets.
You first have to get a thorough understanding of the notion of /limit/
for sequences of sets before you can actually _use_ the notation in a
meaningful (or at least mathematically correct) way.
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Virgil
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: G . Frege
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Prev by Date: Re: elementary and piecewise functions
- Next by Date: Re: elementary and piecewise functions
- Previous by thread: Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Next by thread: Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
