With integrals, Tommy needs better education

On Feb 16, 7:08 pm, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

That makes me more intellectually honest than you, Mr. Tommy-who-can't
understand-the-noun-integral-is-not-a-synonym-for-integer-and-who-
can't-admit-his-error.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

I'm laughing at your inferior intellect!

How's your "education" regarding "integrals 1, 2, 3, 4 ..." going,
Tommy-can't-understand-definitions?

On August 28, 2007, 2:35 PM, Tommy1729 wrote:

"integers ...-2,-1,0,1,2,...

integrals 1,2,3,4,...

natural numbers 0,1,2,3,... "

These tables are based on Tommy's definition of the noun "integral".

Table of integrals:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ...

Here's another table of integrals:

int(c)dx = cx+C

int(x) dx= (1/2)*x^2+C

int(sin(x)) dx= -cos(x)+C

int(e^x) dx= e^x +C

Here's a third table of integrals:

31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ...

Here's a fourth table of integrals:

int(c+x) dx = cx+x^2+C

int(x+y) dx= (1/2)*x^2+yx+C

int(x+y) dy = yx+(1/2)*y^2+C

int(e^x) dy = [e^x] *y +C

.

Quantcast