Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7



G. Frege wrote:

HENCE

S[N] =/= lim S_n[N]
n

(since S[N] = {N} - also already shown by Han).

Again, your "since" _assumes_ the consistency of ZFC and that it is free
from paradoxes. Duuhh .. Now consistency is just granted ! Trivially !

Han de Bruijn

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
    ... >> Han de Bruijn wrote: ... >> jumping directly into an infinite set without specifying any limiting ... Paradoxes are only the discovery of unexpected results, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why exp(-st) in the Laplace Transform?
    ... On 11/25/2004 12:17 PM, Han de Bruijn wrote: ... Thank you Han, ... The first reason for me to submit to ... viel schneidiger unternommen, doch gänzlich mißlang und jetzt zumal, wo ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why exp(-st) in the Laplace Transform?
    ... On 11/25/2004 12:17 PM, Han de Bruijn wrote: ... Thank you Han, ... The first reason for me to submit to ... viel schneidiger unternommen, doch gänzlich mißlang und jetzt zumal, wo ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism
    ... > Han de Bruijn wrote: ... > have no idea about what really can be done in finite (puzzle) time. ... > The "combinatorial explosion" is a red herring. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
    ... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... All I've said is that "potential infinite ... If a mathematical model is not the "real thing," ...
    (sci.math)