Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:13:33 GMT
On 2008-02-21, in sci.math, Mark Nudelman wrote:
Writing a non-trivial program requires skills that are mostly
independent of the language.
Indeed, and such newfangled inventions as the ability to define
functions and procedure of your own and to otherwise structure your
code, apparently missing in Flaming Thunder, are considered to be of
some use by some. Probably elitists, the whole lot of them, unable to
appreciate the beauty and elegance of
Set result to 1.
For year from 2000 to 2008 do
set result to result*year.
Write result.
or encoding the logic of your program in a bunch of imaginatively
placed GOTOs, while, for and until loops and other such bundles of
joy.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: daveparker
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: Mark Nudelman
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- References:
- New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: daveparker
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: daveparker
- Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- From: Mark Nudelman
- New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- Prev by Date: Permutation sum
- Next by Date: Re: lebesgue
- Previous by thread: Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- Next by thread: Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|