Re: constant and locally constant
- From: "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:05:14 -0500
In article
<40ee2c83-6b57-41c5-82a8-57d618743c90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
water <waterloo2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Exercise 1. Show that a function that is locally constant at each
point of an interval [a,b] is constant on [a,b].
A calculus student might "solve" this by spotting that such a function
would have to
have a zero derivative everywhere. Thus, by a familiar calculus
principle, the function
is constant. But the proof of that principle requires a compactness
argument anyway,
and the exercise should be attempted from first principles.
Above is copied from a paper.
I think "a familiar calculus principle" is that f is constant when f
has zero derivative everywhere.
Why does the principle need compactness?
It doesn't "need" compactness, as the other replies show.
However, the simplest known proof does use compactness...
(1) A continuous function on a closed interval achieves a max and min
there (using compactness)
(2) At a local max or min, a differentiable function has derivative 0
(from the definition of derivative)
(3) Rolle's Theorem, easy from (1) and (2)
(4) Mean Value Theorem, using (3).
(5) If a differentiable function is not constant, then by (4) it would
have a point with nonzero derivative.
--
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: constant and locally constant
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: constant and locally constant
- From: William Elliot
- Re: constant and locally constant
- References:
- constant and locally constant
- From: water
- constant and locally constant
- Prev by Date: wholesale nike air max shoes
- Next by Date: Re: What is the geometrical meanning of exact sequence?
- Previous by thread: Re: constant and locally constant
- Next by thread: Re: constant and locally constant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|