Re: constant and locally constant
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:00:17 -0800
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, [ISO-8859-1] Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote:
On Feb 27, 1:12 am, William Elliot <ma...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:f:X -> Y is locally constant when for all x,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, G. A. Edgar wrote:
water <waterloo2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Exercise 1. Show that a function that is locally constant at each
point of an interval [a,b] is constant on [a,b].
Why does the principle need compactness?
It doesn't "need" compactness, as the other replies show.
However, the simplest known proof does use compactness...
(1) A continuous function on a closed interval achieves a max and min
there (using compactness)
The problem does not grant that the funciton is continuous.
A function is continuous iff it is locally continuous,
essentially by definition. On the other hand, a locally
constant function is locally continuous, again essentially
by definition.
some c in Y, open U nhood x with f(U) = {c}.
f:X -> Y is locally continuous when for all x,
some open U nhood x with f|U in C(U,Y).
Ok, by the pasting lemma, locally continuous implies continuous.
Clearly on the other hand, locally constant implies locally continuous.
.
- References:
- constant and locally constant
- From: water
- Re: constant and locally constant
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: constant and locally constant
- From: William Elliot
- Re: constant and locally constant
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- constant and locally constant
- Prev by Date: Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- Next by Date: Re: interview question on primes
- Previous by thread: Re: constant and locally constant
- Next by thread: Re: constant and locally constant
- Index(es):