Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:22:44 -0700
In article <Ypjxj.303117$iQ1.27046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-02-27, in sci.math, Virgil wrote:
I recall it, but, absent any reference to it in the post I was
responding to, was not aware that it was the error being referred to. It
is certainly not the only error I have ever made.
It was not at all my intention to imply that was the only error you've
ever made. As far as I can recall, you have not otherwise horribly
erred in the course of this particular thread.
Perhaps I am overly sensitive to my own errors, from seeing WM so
totally insensitive to his.
.
- References:
- Re: Axiom of choice
- From: lwalke3
- another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: tommy1729
- Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: Virgil
- Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: Virgil
- Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Axiom of choice
- Prev by Date: Sinc sum
- Next by Date: Introductory Circuit Analysis (11th Ed., Robert L. Boylestad) solutions manual
- Previous by thread: Re: another cantorian disproven !!!!! :-D
- Next by thread: Re: Axiom of choice
- Index(es):