Re: Some question in prime number!
- From: jankrihau@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:35:57 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 1, 12:22 am, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
But 11 is the sum of 3 distinct primes.
Actually, no. If an odd number is the sum of three distinct primes, 2
is not one of them. And the sum of the three smallest primes is 3+5+7
= 15.
17 is not the the sum of three distinct primes either: 3 must be one
of them, as 5+7+11 = 23 > 17. But 17-3 = 14 can only be written as the
sum of two distinct primes in one way: 3+11, where we have used the
term 3 once again.
---
J K Haugland
http://home.no.net/zamunda
.
- References:
- Re: Some question in prime number!
- From: quasi
- Re: Some question in prime number!
- Prev by Date: Burnside group
- Next by Date: Re: -- Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you. [3]
- Previous by thread: Re: Some question in prime number!
- Next by thread: Re: Some question in prime number!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|