Re: If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:59:52 +0100
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:54:43 +0000 (UTC), jgamble@xxxxxxxxx (John M. Gamble)
wrote:
Gauss?Yes, sorry about that, I was thinking of a different mathematician.Gödel certainly was one them (von Neumann was born in 1903, Gödel in 1906).Hmm. The passage reads "of the time", not "of all time." Granted,
Godel might be one of them.
the second interpretation might be what he meant, but if it isn't,
we probably need to look for someone who was von Neumann's
contemporary.
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- From: kj
- Re: If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- From: G . Frege
- If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- Prev by Date: Re: -- Lucky with Erdos-Woods numbers?
- Next by Date: -- Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you. [4]
- Previous by thread: Re: If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- Next by thread: Re: If von Neumann was #3, who were #1 and #2?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
