Re: Prime Square Conjecture
- From: "Anthony A. Aiya-Oba" <aaiyaoba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:19:31 EST
Hi Aboulfotouh:
Thanks for your continued interest in the discovery of 1^2= 3.
Use of new discovery is needless,
when and where the traditional
is all that is needed.
Please, recall how some highly learned individuals in the past, thought it was out of place, when the existence of the elementary particle neutrino, was first postulated by physicist Wolfgang Pauli.
Today, the existence of neutrino, has long been confirmed empirically, and forms integral part of our 21st Century understanding of the proper structure of the atom and the Cosmos.
Why the rush? There is enough time for humanity to find out the value in the discovery of 1^2 = 3. It will come as new understanding of the geometric foundations of Spacetime,though it seems meaningless to the convention now. -Aiya-Oba.
.
- Prev by Date: Tommy1729 and his WRONG definition of the noun "integral" makes Tommy1729 a crank. Shame on sci.math for not correcting dumb Tommy1729.
- Next by Date: Re: GOOD !!! china wholesale Lrg Ed Hardy Coogi Evisu Hoody,Jeans,T-shirts,Streetwear (WWW.GLOBNIKESNEAKERS.COM) discount gucci prada chanel miumiu handbag
- Previous by thread: Re: Prime Square Conjecture
- Next by thread: Question on regular functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|