Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: Tim Little <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:02:28 -0000
On 2008-03-14, S_Paske@xxxxxxxxxxx <S_Paske@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suppose one were to construct a list of integers using this method:
1 = 2^0 * 3^0 * 5^0 * 7^0...
2 = 2^1 * 3^0 * 5^0 * 7^0...
3 = 2^0 * 3^1 * 5^0 * 7^0...
...
Once someone has completed the list of all of the integers, it seems i
can use the same diagnoalization argument to show that there is an
integer not in the list.
In the diagonalization of the reals, every infinite sequence of digits
represents a real number.
How do you prove that what you end up with in your case is an integer?
It's an infinite product, and infinite products are only defined where
a suitable limit exists.
- Tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- References:
- Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Prev by Date: Re: Any string in an infinite series?
- Next by Date: Re: compute a limit
- Previous by thread: Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Next by thread: Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Index(es):