Re: math -- algebraic degree vs integral degree
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:49:59 -0500
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:53:14 EDT, Hagen <knaf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let R, S be integral domains, where R is contained in
S.
Suppose s in S is such that s is integral over R.
Let J = {f in R[x] | f(s) = 0}
Let m be the "algebraic degree of s over R", that is,
m = min {deg(f) | f in J, f =/= 0}
and let n be the "integral degree of s over R", that
is,
n = min {deg(f) | f in J, f monic}
Clearly, we always have m <= n.
In the thread
"Proof of existence of unique monic polynomial of
of minimal degree",
I proved that if R is a UFD, then m = n.
Prove or disprove:
If R is integrally closed, then m = n.
quasi
The algebraic degree equals the degree of the minimal
polynomial f \in K[x] of s over K:=Frac(R). Hence if
we show f \in R[x] we are through.
1. By assumption R can be expressed as an intersection of
valuation rings O_v of K. Let V be the family of valuations
of K appearing in this representation.
2. A valuation v of K can be extended to the polynomial
ring K[x] resp. its field of fractions K(x) by setting
v_x(p):=min (v(c) : c runs through the coefficients of p)
where p \in K[x].
(To prove that v_x is a valuation one needs a generalization
of the so-called Lemma of Gauss for polynomials over factorial
rings.)
3. A polynomial p \in K[x] lies in R[x] if and only if v_x(p)>=0
for all valuations v appearing in V.
4. Let g \in R[x] be a monic polynomial such that g(s)=0 and let
f \in K[x] be the (monic) minimal polynomial of s over K.
Then g=f*h for some h \in K[x]. Since g and f are monic, h is
monic too.
For every valuation v \in V one has
v_x(g)=v_x(f)+v_x(h)
Since g is monic and in R[x]: v_x(g)=0.
Since f and h are monic: v_x(f)<=0 and v_x(h)<=0.
Thus v_x(f)=0.
Nice.
Thank you.
quasi
.
- References:
- math -- algebraic degree vs integral degree
- From: quasi
- Re: math -- algebraic degree vs integral degree
- From: Hagen
- math -- algebraic degree vs integral degree
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple Random Walk question
- Next by Date: Re: enumerating binary matrices
- Previous by thread: Re: math -- algebraic degree vs integral degree
- Next by thread: taylor series of sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|