Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 20, 5:25 pm, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT), S_Pa...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
let sp=set of primes.
let sp_1=set of primes but not those that have composite index.
let sp_2=set of sp_1 but not those that have composite index.
...
I have proven that an irrational number is just one whose prime
factors are sp_n as sp-->oo.
Gibberish.
You have no clue as to what would constitute a valid mathematical
proof.
quasi
But i do know how the ulam spiral and the zeta function are related to
the plane, even if i can not express it in your terms. Why don't you
help me clean it up?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: quasi
- Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Prev by Date: Re: How do I calculate the volume of this 8 vertices block?
- Next by Date: math : a challenge from tommy1729
- Previous by thread: Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Next by thread: Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
