Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:25:50 -0500
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT), S_Paske@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
let sp=set of primes.
let sp_1=set of primes but not those that have composite index.
let sp_2=set of sp_1 but not those that have composite index.
...
I have proven that an irrational number is just one whose prime
factors are sp_n as sp-->oo.
Gibberish.
You have no clue as to what would constitute a valid mathematical
proof.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- References:
- Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- From: S_Paske
- Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Prev by Date: Re: WHY HAS THIS SITE BECOME SUCH A SPAM TARGET???
- Next by Date: Re: How do I calculate the volume of this 8 vertices block?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Next by thread: Re: Cardnality of integers > Cardnality of integers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading