Re: The big bang, the primes, and the RH

On Mar 22, 10:43 am, S_Pa...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:54 am, S_Pa...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Mar 22, 2:36 am, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 05:54:13 -0000, Tim Little

<t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-03-22, S_Pa...@xxxxxxxxxxx <S_Pa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Imagine an array of squares leading off to infinity.
Now let me ask what is the the probability of picking a particular
square at random from the first N.

Let me ask you to clarify your question.

Do you mean "probability that a particular square picked at random is
from the first N"?  Or do you mean "probability that a square picked
at random from the first N is a particular square"?

But then I read the rest...

However, as n increases to infinity, this function tends to e^oo,
and i submit it makes perfect sense.

I submit that you are a blithering idiot.

I think only part idiot.

And part troll.

quasi- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

These are dimensions!
To prove rh, you must first square the circle, then cube space...

'In 1 dimension, the sum for primes for only primes is is (1+1/n)^1 as
n-->oo
Draw the ulam spiral in 2 dimensions, the sum for squares is (1+1/n)^2
as n --->oo
Draw the ulam spiral in 3 dimensions, the sum is (1+1/n)^3 as n-->oo
But in infinite dimensions, the sum approaches. (1+1/n)^n-->oo
Thus, if your throw a dart at an infinite dimensional object, the
probability that you will land on 1 is 1.

How do i know this?
Because, in one dimension, the probability is (1+1/n)^1 as n-->oo
Euler has proven that in 2 dimensions, the 'flux' of the squares
leaving the circle 1/zeta(oo-2) is equal to the 'flux' of the squares
entering from the outside.
Draw the ulam spiral in 3 dimensions with cubes.
Euler has proven that in 3 dimensions, the 'flux' of the cubes leaving
the sphere that encloses the unit cube by 1/zeta(oo-3)=must be equal
to the flux of the non cubes entering this sphere.

Now, what are the primes?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How to calculate this 'flux'?
Draw a square in 2 dimensions, draw a circle in 2 dimensions where the
areas are equal.
What is the flux through the circle from the inside to the outside?
Draw a sphere in 3 dimensions, draw a cube in 3 dimensions where the
areas are equal.
What is the flux through the sphere from the inside to the outside?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As the number of dimensions increases, the flux through the unit n-
dimensional circle from the surface of the unit n dimensioanl square
approaches e^x
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: FLT - new thread
    ... It is possible to remove x or y from the formula and keep the soloution ... as d represents the number of dimensions. ... The explanation of why this formula works takes a bit more to ... at one corner is another smaller square. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The big bang, the primes, and the RH
    ... square at random from the first N. ... Draw the ulam spiral in 2 dimensions, the sum for squares is ^2 ... Euler has proven that in 2 dimensions, the 'flux' of the squares ... Draw the ulam spiral in 3 dimensions with cubes. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The big bang, the primes, and the RH
    ... square at random from the first N. ... To prove rh, you must first square the circle, then cube space... ... Euler has proven that in 2 dimensions, the 'flux' of the squares ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Areal density really so high?
    ... The point I originally attempted to make was that there might be significant differences between what the maximum TPI may be (possibly based on criteria which have little to do with the actual dimensions of the magnetized bit areas) and what the shape of those magnetized bit areas actually looked like. ... So you end up sending a relatively higher current down the wire from the write driver to the write head. ... As an aside, while Mark's paper indicated the benefit of square cells, note that most of the pictures and diagrams show rectangular cells. ...
    (comp.arch)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... Those n-tuples represent points in that set of dimensions. ... Infinite sets require "less than". ... Without size for a point larger than 0, can you show a square includes more ...
    (sci.math)
Loading