Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- From: jane <jane1806@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:15:26 EDT
On Apr 1, 11:47 am, jane <jane1...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would be grateful if someone could explain me thefollowing:
mremorphic quadratic differentials on X with only
Let X be a Riemann surface, Q(X) = the space of
simple poles.
Theta - sheaf of holomorphic vector fields on X.duality, but i don't see how exactly. Let me state
How exactly one can understand that
H^1(X, Theta)* isomorphic Q(x)
I know this should be a consequence of the Serre
the Serre duality theorem i know:
and Omega is the sheaf of meromorphic 1-forms on X.
H^1(X, O)* isomorphic to H^0(X, Omega),
where O is the sheaf of holomorphic functions on X
Thanks a lot in advance,
There is a slightly more general version, which
states that
H^1(X, F)* = H^0(X, F* tensor Omega)
Thanks a lot for the answer. So you suggest take F to be the sheaf of holomorphic vector fields on X.
What does the notation F* tensor mean, what you denote by F* (pullback under what ?)
and could you please explain how do we get as F* tensor Omega = Q(x), the space of integrable quadratic forms ?
Thanks.
for a locally free sheave F on X, and for example.
X projective and smooth.
-- m
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- References:
- Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- Prev by Date: hiromi oshima jamie westenhiser free video galleries
- Next by Date: Re: Compact and Cover
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding Serre duality [Riemann surface context]
- Index(es):