Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???

From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:07:07 +0200

Aatu Koskensilta wrote:

On 2008-04-01, in sci.math, amy666 wrote:

when i ask cantorians (here or somewhere else ) what is 2^aleph_x
they answer aleph_(x+1).

Who are these "cantorians"?

Those who reply to WM in
"Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor" ?

Han de Bruijn

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
  - From: Jesse F. Hughes

References:
- 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
  - From: amy666
- Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
  - From: Aatu Koskensilta

Prev by Date: Question about Variance propagation of random variables
Next by Date: Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) !! aleph = beth !!
Previous by thread: Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
Next by thread: Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: An uncountable countable set
... Han de Bruijn wrote: ... It was recognized long before Cantor that there isn't a simple answer to ... to a meaningless question. ...
(sci.math)
Re: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
... Han de Bruijn writes: ... A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor"? ... -- JSH channels Spock and generic politicians everywhere ...
(sci.math)
Re: Calculus XOR Probability
... Thus, without Cantor, Olber's paradox is easily solved. ... Han de Bruijn ...
(sci.math)
Re: Godels proof, truth, reality, self-awareness, and all that jazz
... Aatu Koskensilta wrote: ... Neumann-Bernays-Gödel set theory was in terms of functions, ... Han de Bruijn ...
(sci.math)
Re: Wiles proof of Fermat theorem
... Aatu Koskensilta wrote: ... doesn't that say something about mathematics? ... Han de Bruijn ...
(sci.math)