Re: Protecting a point (math puzzle)
- From: Tim Little <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:34:58 -0500
On 2008-04-02, A.B. <ab2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it's really whether there exists T outside of the convex hull of
{S1...Sp} such that d(T,M) < min(d(T,Si))
Then 2N+2 points will always be sufficient in N dimensions. Consider
a small simplex around the merchant embedded inside a sufficiently
large outer one.
- Tim
.
- References:
- Protecting a point (math puzzle)
- From: A.B.
- Re: Protecting a point (math puzzle)
- From: A.B.
- Protecting a point (math puzzle)
- Prev by Date: Converse of Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
- Next by Date: Re: Benefit of Bayesian estimation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Protecting a point (math puzzle)
- Next by thread: 2^ aleph_x =/= aleph(x+1) according to tim ???
- Index(es):
