Re: math : the problem with points.
- From: Tim Little <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:39:57 -0500
On 2008-04-05, Julio Di Egidio <julio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we get into the domain of computable numbers (actual numbers),
and take closed interval arithmetic as reference, that lower limit
(actually) exists and it is the floating-point limit to underflow,
intrinsic to any specific implementation. It is, in fact, under all
respects, a rational number.
No, there are plenty of computation systems that have no such element
and do not have underflow. Exact arbitrary-precision rational
arithmetic, for example.
There are even systems that can handle some exact irrationals and even
transcendentals.
Fixed-precision floating point numbers are just one system that has
fast hardware support in practice, and certainly doesn't define all
computational possibilities.
- Tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: math : the problem with points.
- From: Julio Di Egidio
- Re: math : the problem with points.
- References:
- Re: math : the problem with points.
- From: Gonçalo Rodrigues
- Re: math : the problem with points.
- From: Julio Di Egidio
- Re: math : the problem with points.
- Prev by Date: Re: Peano curve is wrong
- Next by Date: Re: math : the problem with points.
- Previous by thread: Re: math : the problem with points.
- Next by thread: Re: math : the problem with points.
- Index(es):