Re: mathematics requires creativity and imagination (small correction )
- From: amy666 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:20:05 EDT
mathematics requires creativity and imagination.and
this is a truth not told enough.
sure we dont need imagination in the way that
religion does.
but FLT and RH are clear examples of creativity
imagination , not just intelligence.creativity
same applies to the cantor function.
in fact most mathematians that made it into the
history books had those two properties (
and imagination ) alongside intelligence alone.it
even if that creativity is poor in the sence that
strongly resembles other famous ideas.yet
as an example of a mathematician with this poor
intresting creativity is e.g. ramanujan.B
he also investigated critical lines alike RH.
although the imitation is clear , he learned from
Riemann RH a lot about number theory and this leadto
his work on L-series and their critical lines.reputation
( even leading to RH hypotheses )
usually imitations are dumb.
but in math they are common , one learns from
eachother and despite any monkey can copy , humans
extend or change a bit.
cause for that is intelligence but also creativity
and imagination.
david hilbert supported that idea too.
one of the goals of this thread is to defend
creativity and imagination and popularize it.
because imagination and creativity has the
of being linked to music arts etc but not to math.or
math has the reputation of being static, with
absolute truths and without freedom, imagination
creativity.3D
and thus this leads to a boring reputation.
but this is a big lie !
mathematics is apart from logic , rationality and
intelligence all about creativity and imagination.
there are also freedoms in the sence that you can
pick axioms.
another goal of this thread is to popularize and
investigate critical lines or critical surfaces in
integer domain algebra's.
let t denote a number of such an algebra.
e.g. claims like all zero's of f(t)=0 are
zero-divisors.
this is probably a bad example , since if considered
over the complex , 0 is the solution then in 3d it
would lead to zero-divisors exclusively.
so all zero's of f(t)= 0 are on a line or surface
nonparrallel to the zero-divisors.
?
why not investigate the 3rd dimension in this way
its the next logical step in math creativity and
imagination and probably math in general.
regards
tommy1729
regards
tommy1729
jesus , im i really the only person here who believes in the importance of creativity and imagination in math ?
am i the only one intrested in 3D critical lines a la RH ?
tommy1729
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Next by Date: Re: What is math? And my thoughts...
- Previous by thread: Re: mathematics requires creativity and imagination (small correction )
- Next by thread: Re: mathematics requires creativity and imagination (small correction )
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
