Local Homeomorphisms
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:48:38 -0700
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Jannick Asmus wrote:
On 18.04.2008 12:13, William Elliot wrote:
Continuous f:X -> Y is a local homeomorphism when for all x,
some open U nhood x with U homeomorphic f(U) and f(U) open.
Then clearly local homeomorphisms are open and when surjective
are quotient maps.
Why is it that f(U) needs to be open?
This is just a question of definition, hence convention. I do not argue
about definitions.
What goes wrong if f(U) isn't open?
Locally compact is another property of the domain space.Apparently not needed.
Always depends on what you mean with "local homeomorphism". Some people
use the wording "(local) homeomorphism on the image of f equipped with
the trace topology". This makes it clearer in some cases. I think this
is what you are talking about.
What's the trace topology?
Another counter example is f:[0,1) -> S^1.Let f:X -> Y be a continuous bijection, X locally compact, Y Hausdorff.
Is f a local homeomorphism? Well clearly for all x, some
open U nhood x with U homeomorphic f(U), but is f(U) open?
Certainly not: identity map (R,discrete topology) -> (R,norm topology).
It appears than in the notion of covering map, that the local
homeomorphism has f(U) being open, not by the definition of
local homeomorphism, but by the definition of covering map.
In other words
covering map --> local homeomorphism with open local images.
What's the definition of HTH?Some compact K with x in int K
f:int K -> Y closed continuous bijection.
int K homeomorphic f(int K)
Why is f(int K) open, or is it?
HTH.HTH ?
Convention - like "nhood". I do not want to argue about something like
this. ;)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- References:
- Local Homeomorphisms
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Local Homeomorphisms
- Prev by Date: Analysis with sinx/sinx+cosx.
- Next by Date: Re: Analysis with sinx/sinx+cosx.
- Previous by thread: Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- Next by thread: Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|