Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:28:05 -0400
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:03:09 GMT, Gerry Myerson
<gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <480B30B3.2040307@xxxxxx>,
Jannick Asmus <jannick.news@xxxxxx> wrote:
On 20.04.2008 13:36, quasi wrote:
This might be easy, I'm not sure ...
Prove or disprove:
If f,g : [-1,1] --> (0,infinity) are continuous functions of x such
that
int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
holds for infinitely many r > 0, then it holds for all r > 0.
Yes, if the infinitely many r's have an accumulation point: Consider the
analytic function z -> int(exp(z.ln(f)) - exp(z.ln(g), x = -1...1) on C.
On the other hand,
if f is the constant 17,
and g is the constant minus 17,
then the integral is zero for all even integers r,
but not for all r > 0.
Although the problem requires f,g to be positive, for all x.
So the problem is not resolved for the case where the set of known
values of r doesn't have an accumulation point.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- References:
- math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- From: quasi
- Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- From: Gerry Myerson
- math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- Prev by Date: Re: Local Homeomorphisms
- Next by Date: Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- Previous by thread: Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- Next by thread: Re: math -- int(f^r - g^r, x = -1..1) = 0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|