Re: Differentiating Implicitly-
- From: JEMebius <jemebius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:37:59 +0100
Buffalo Books wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please help me to differentiate the following implicitly:
2x^2 y + sin y = 7
Thank you for your help in advance!
The good old-fashioned pre-Cauchy way:
d(2x^2 y + sin y) = 0;
d(2x^2 y + sin y) = d(2x^2 y) + d(sin y) =
2x^2 dy + 4xy.dx + cos(y).dy =
4xy.dx + (2x^2 + cos y)dy = 0.
Want derivative of y as a function of x?
Then dy/dx = -4xy / (2x^2 + cos y), and get rid of y in the RHS by means of the original relation 2x^2 y + sin y = 7. This requires solving a transcendental equation.
Want derivative of x as a function of y?
Then dx/dy = ... etc. This is easier than with y as a function of x.
All this is justified by the well-known definitions and theorems of differential calculus as founded by Cauchy. Think of the modern definition of differentiability, implicit-function theorems, differential 1-forms (gradients), and please keep in mind:
differential calculus is essentially about approximations of non-linear situations by their linear counterparts.
Johan E. Mebius
.
- References:
- Differentiating Implicitly
- From: Buffalo Books
- Differentiating Implicitly
- Prev by Date: DONT SEE MY WEBSITE
- Next by Date: Re: lim (n --> oo) e^(-n) (1 + n + (n^2)/2!....+ (n^n)/n! )
- Previous by thread: Re: Differentiating Implicitly
- Next by thread: High Replica Louis Vuitton.LV.Hermes.Fendi.Chloe.Gucci.Chanel.Balenciaga.Loewe Handbag.Purse.Bag.Bags Replica 2008 newest.new www.selltopgoods.com
- Index(es):