-- variable-reduced polynomials
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:22:04 -0400
Let f be an n-variate integer polynomial.
By range(f), we mean f(Z^n). Thus range(f) is a subset of Z.
Call integer polynomials f,g "range-equivalent" if range(f) =
range(g).
Call an n-variate integer polynomial f "variable reduced" if there
does not exist an m-variate integer polynomial g, range-equivalent to
f, such that m < n.
In other words, if f is variable reduced, then range(f) can't be
represented as the range of an integer polynomial with less variables.
Examples ...
Let
a = x
b = x + y
c = x1^2 + x2^2 + x3^2 + x4^2 - y1^2
Then a,b,c are range-equivalent to each other, but only a is
variable-reduced.
Here's a problem ...
Prove or disprove:
If integer polynomials f,g are range-equivalent, and if g is
variable-reduced, then f = g o h, for some integer polynomial h.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -- variable-reduced polynomials
- From: amy666
- Re: -- variable-reduced polynomials
- From: Tim Little
- Re: -- variable-reduced polynomials
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: -- variable-reduced polynomials
- Prev by Date: Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
- Next by Date: Re: Irreducible surjective maps
- Previous by thread: Need Algorithm For Drawing Computer Setup
- Next by thread: Re: -- variable-reduced polynomials
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|