Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Denis Feldmann <feldmann.denis.asupprimer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 17:30:29 +0200
Mark a écrit :
"Martin Wanvik" <martinw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:15978560.1209647023542.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHave you read the word "undefined" in David Ullrich anwer?Hi, most definitions of element and set I have comeYou might find the following wikipedia articles helpful:
across, say something
like,
An element is any object of our perception or of our
thought.
A set is a collection of unique elements.
So whats a collection?
Wolfram says it's a multiset.
Wiki says it's a multiset.
So whats a multiset?
[...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_set_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiomatic_set_theory
-- Martin Wanvik
I've read the articles, but they do not define what a collection is. The wiki article for collection redirects to multiset.
.
- References:
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Martin Wanvik
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Prev by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Previous by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|