Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: "Mark" <user@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:48:39 +0100
"Arturo Magidin" <magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fvcpc6$27fe$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <oClSj.1209$7z4.15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark <user@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip N/A stuff]
Did you bother to read them? They were not "Not applicable". They are
direct quotes that show that the notion of "set" is simply NOT DEFINED
in modern mathematics. Perhaps you should re-read them, instead of
dismissing them out of hand.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
I dismissed them as N/A because they are N/A to my question about a
definition for collection.
.
- References:
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Prev by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Previous by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Index(es):