Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
On May 1, 6:26 pm, "Mark" <u...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Virgil-DD2602.14422401052008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <wKpSj.1014$NZ7....@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mark" <u...@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I was basically asking whether elements in a set need to share something
in
common.
Other than membership in that set, no!
Then why would they be in a set in the first place?
Can you provide me with an example of a set whose elements have nothing in
common with each other, other than the fact that they belong to the set?
That is impossible: if theo things x and y have in common
the property of both belonging to a set A, then they also
have the property of belonging to the set {A, x, y}.
-- m
.
- References:
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Prev by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by Date: Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
- Previous by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Index(es):