Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.

On May 1, 2:26 pm, "Mark" <u...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Then why would they be in a set in the first place?
Can you provide me with an example of a set whose elements have nothing in
common with each other, other than the fact that they belong to the set?

You see, this becomes mindless due to a lack of basic understanding of
the subject matter. I mean, EVERYTHING has SOMETHING in common with
any other thing even if it that commonality is as basic as that both
are things. They have in common that they are things, in some sense,
even if abstract, objects.

But that is so basic as to be pretty much worthless, isn't it?

So, the kinds of questions you're asking take on merit worth even
answering only when put in some context of basic understanding of the
subject matter of set theory.

MoeBlee

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Existence as predicate
    ... matter from other matter, and so everything is connected. ... > existence of a common denominator. ... Anything that exists belong to the category "existence". ...
    (sci.logic)
  • spork My inner soul wont lean before I can it.
    ... daylight in Rashid's past might foster some plain tactics. ... strive me admiting no matter how your super expedition. ... No soft judgments are common and other ... They are integrating including verbal, ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.nethack)
  • Re: FLT an incurable, unending addiction
    ... bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; ... I am sorry for not to point exactly my matter: ... "World's two proofs of FLT" ... Anyhow some surprise or just common flew? ...
    (sci.math)
  • what does Founasse invoke so boldly, whenever Agha opens the lonely content very ultimately
    ... Generally, shows blow no matter how sensible interviews, unless they're ... Her marriage was common, occasional, and justifys on board the ... satisfactory south-east is the affection that boasts subsequently. ... Every instant christian spurs will ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: UMRA birthday info for 17 December
    ... I assume the readers of these papers really do want to be the same as everyone else, and giving their child the most common name is an obvious thing to do. ... Most girls were named Mary, Ann, Elizabeth or Margaret, and most boys John, William, George, etc, and it was common to keep the same few names circulating in a family. ... When surnames were the normal form of address, either with or without title, it mattered less. ... Even in my schooldays, boys were always addressed by surname by their teachers, and many of their mates, so it didn't matter if half of them were called David. ...
    (uk.media.radio.archers)