Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 16:39:26 -0600
In article <tAqSj.1338$_f5.95@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mark" <user@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Virgil-DD2602.14422401052008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <wKpSj.1014$NZ7.376@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mark" <user@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I was basically asking whether elements in a set need to share something
in
common.
Other than membership in that set, no!
Then why would they be in a set in the first place?
Because its there! Edmund Hillary understood!
Can you provide me with an example of a set whose elements have nothing in
common with each other, other than the fact that they belong to the set?
I will not. I will let you worry about whether I can or not.
.
- References:
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Mark
- Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Prev by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by Date: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Previous by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|