Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: bill <b92057@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
On May 1, 4:55 am, "Mark" <u...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, most definitions of element and set I have come across, say something
like,
An element is any object of our perception or of our thought.
A set is a collection of unique elements.
So whats a collection?
Wolfram says it's a multiset.
Wiki says it's a multiset.
So whats a multiset?
Wolfram says it's a set-like object.
Wiki says it's a generalization of a set.
This basically gives the following definitions.
A multiset is a collection of elements
A set is a multiset of unique elements.
So whats a collection?
Would this be a good definition of colletion,
A collection is any elements which have something in common.
Or could someone give a better definition?
IMHO, one should not attempt to define "sets" until
one knows everything that can possibly be known about
sets and then it won't be necessary!
Bill J
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Weird simplification result with MAPLE
- Next by Date: Re: Is TOA a generalized ring of some sort?
- Previous by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading