Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Frederick Williams <"Frederick Williams"@antispamhotmail.co.uk.invalid>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 11:07:48 +0100
Mark wrote:
Hi, most definitions of element and set I have come across, say something
like,
An element is any object of our perception or of our thought.
So said Cantor, but that was a long time ago.
A set is a collection of unique elements.
So whats a collection?
Wolfram says it's a multiset.
Wiki says it's a multiset.
So whats a multiset?
Wolfram says it's a set-like object.
Wiki says it's a generalization of a set.
This basically gives the following definitions.
A multiset is a collection of elements
A set is a multiset of unique elements.
So whats a collection?
Would this be a good definition of colletion,
A collection is any elements which have something in common.
Or could someone give a better definition?
In one of the usual set theories, ZF, everything is a set including
elements. What a set is, is defined contextually by the axioms. There
is no nominal definition of set.
--
Remove "antispam" and ".invalid" for e-mail address.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- From: Julio Di Egidio
- Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- References:
- Prev by Date: New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 05, 2008
- Next by Date: Re: Hypocrisy
- Previous by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Next by thread: Re: Questioning the defintions of set and element.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|