Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: "T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 10:00:12 EDT
I don't care about your opinions and I don't care whereyour
Well, the behavior of heat is modeled by the Ricci
Flow, too. How does your model differ? The
behavior
of thermodynamic entropy discovered by Carnot and
Clausius is modeled in communication theory by
Shannon,
using the physical entropy equations. How does
compare
theory of communication by Riccati equations
to
Shannon's theory of communication?
TomI have to say that I have done classical equations of
physics with Riccati, and thus PDE of heat, wave etc,
will be done by Riccati (eventually).
I am sure your equation of Ricci flow will possibly
wind up through solving the classical equations of
physics.
By the way my Ph.D. degree is on differential
equations from Cambridge University, 1979, and I have
also lectured PDE courses.
Try to see my notes on New Energy Formula.
you got your degree.
You have compared your results to Descartes, Newton and
Einstein--without ever giving any motivation comparable
to the Cartesian plane, the meaning of acceleration in
a gravity field, or the limit of physical communication,
as these three did.
Support your claims or stop making them. You're repeating
the same old hot air.
Tom
Dr.M.Basti.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: Mehran Basti
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- References:
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: Mehran Basti
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Prev by Date: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Next by Date: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Previous by thread: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Next by thread: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|